<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Security Fight Club &#187; Security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.securityfightclub.com/category/security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.securityfightclub.com</link>
	<description>Brought to you by Awareness Technologies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 04:08:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Another round of SQL Injection attacks are happening RIGHT NOW&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.securityfightclub.com/another-round-of-sql-injection-attacks-are-happening-right-now/</link>
		<comments>http://www.securityfightclub.com/another-round-of-sql-injection-attacks-are-happening-right-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 03:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mrdenny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Attack Scripts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Databases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[External Threats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL Injection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL Server]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securityfightclub.com/?p=177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#8217;s right you&#8217;ve heard it here first (ok, probably second or third, but at least in the top 10).  A hacking group is using SQL Injection attacks to break into websites in-mass and download malicious content from 318x.com.
As of December 10, 2009 over 132,000 websites have been compromised and are serving up the malicious content.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s right you&#8217;ve heard it here first (ok, probably second or third, but at least in the top 10).  A hacking group is using <a href="http://www.net-security.org/secworld.php?id=8604" target="_blank">SQL Injection attacks</a> to break into websites in-mass and download malicious content from 318x.com.</p>
<p>As of December 10, 2009 over 132,000 websites have been compromised and are serving up the malicious content.  The attack loads up an Iframe onto the websites via the data returned from the database which eventually leads the user (without there knowledge) to download data from 318x.com which then installats a rootkit-enabled variant of the Buzus backdoor trojan.  The full path of what happens can be found on the link above.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve talked about the securing your website from SQL Injection attacks <a href="http://www.securityfightclub.com/gonzalez-tj-max-hacker-gets-15-25-years/" target="_blank">here</a>, <a href="http://www.securityfightclub.com/more-charges-filed-against-tjmax-hackers/" target="_blank">here</a> and <a href="http://www.securityfightclub.com/hackers-have-actually-broken-into-the-brazilian-power-grid/" target="_blank">here</a>, apparently there are tons of sites out there which haven&#8217;t been listening.</p>
<p>Denny</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securityfightclub.com/another-round-of-sql-injection-attacks-are-happening-right-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>T-Mobile UK Employees have been seeing your information</title>
		<link>http://www.securityfightclub.com/t-mobile-uk-employees-have-been-seeing-your-information/</link>
		<comments>http://www.securityfightclub.com/t-mobile-uk-employees-have-been-seeing-your-information/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 19:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mrdenny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data Loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internal Threats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T-Mobile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securityfightclub.com/?p=174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK, so the title is a little more scary than needed, but it did the job, and got you to look at the article.
Customers at T-Mobile UK have been found to have been selling customer information to data brokers who work on behalf of other cellular phone companies in the UK.Obviously T-Mobile wasn&#8217;t aware that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, so the title is a little more scary than needed, but it did the job, and got you to look at the article.</p>
<p>Customers at T-Mobile UK have been found to have been <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/8364421.stm" target="_blank">selling customer information</a> to data brokers who work on behalf of other cellular phone companies in the UK.<span id="more-174"></span>Obviously T-Mobile wasn&#8217;t aware that this was happening. However they needed to put more projections in place to ensure that this didn&#8217;t happen. Hopefully other companies will learn from this data breach and ensure that their employees aren&#8217;t selling off customer data.  I can&#8217;t stress enough that this wasn&#8217;t an external break-in.  This was employees selling customer data which they got from the customer management system.</p>
<p>I also hope that the prosecution of people responsible for this data theft and sale makes the next person think twice about doing this.  As the case moves forward I&#8217;ll be sure to post updates here.</p>
<p>Denny</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securityfightclub.com/t-mobile-uk-employees-have-been-seeing-your-information/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hackers have actually broken into the Brazilian Power Grid</title>
		<link>http://www.securityfightclub.com/hackers-have-actually-broken-into-the-brazilian-power-grid/</link>
		<comments>http://www.securityfightclub.com/hackers-have-actually-broken-into-the-brazilian-power-grid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mrdenny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[External Threats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL Injection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utility Companies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securityfightclub.com/?p=172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About a week ago 60 Minutes covered a story about hackers breaking into the Brazilian power grid and causing power outages through out the country.  The common believe is that this story wasn&#8217;t actually correct.  However hackers appear to have liked the idea, and have done what was originally claimed in the story.
Google has a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About a week ago 60 Minutes covered a story about hackers breaking into the Brazilian power grid and causing power outages through out the country.  The common believe is that this story wasn&#8217;t actually correct.  However hackers appear to have liked the idea, and have done what was originally claimed in the story.<span id="more-172"></span></p>
<p>Google has a <a href="http://translate.google.com/translate?js=y&amp;prev=_t&amp;hl=en&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;u=http%3A%2F%2Fg1.globo.com%2FNoticias%2FTecnologia%2F0%2C%2CMUL1380926-6174%2C00-HACKERS%2BINVADIRAM%2BSITE%2BDIZ%2BONS.html&amp;sl=pt&amp;tl=en" target="_blank">translation of the article</a>, and the <a href="http://g1.globo.com/Noticias/Tecnologia/0,,MUL1380926-6174,00-HACKERS+INVADIRAM+SITE+DIZ+ONS.html" target="_blank">original can be found here</a>.</p>
<p>The power company is question claims that the blackout which hit 18 Brazilian states on Tuesday was not caused by the hackers.  However the timing out the attack and the outage is very suspicious.  This just goes to show that utilities needs to take even more care that other companies to secure there environments to ensure that the services which they provide remain online as peoples live depend on the power staying on.</p>
<p>Based on the results of testing against the sites as reported <a href="http://darkreading.com/blog/archives/2009/11/how_to_hack_a_b.html;jsessionid=N4RKLB425E4DDQE1GHPSKHWATMY32JVN" target="_blank">by Darkreading</a> the standard SQL Injection attack may have been used in this case to attack the site and break in.  One would think that a company as large as a countries power company would be able to have developers which wouldn&#8217;t allow SQL Injection attacks.</p>
<p>Denny</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securityfightclub.com/hackers-have-actually-broken-into-the-brazilian-power-grid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Security by obscurity is not security at all</title>
		<link>http://www.securityfightclub.com/security-by-obscurity-is-not-security-at-all/</link>
		<comments>http://www.securityfightclub.com/security-by-obscurity-is-not-security-at-all/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 21:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mrdenny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data Loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Theft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Theft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securityfightclub.com/?p=39</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Probably about the worst security plan you can ever use is security by obscurity.In case you aren&#8217;t familiar with the term, security by obscurity is when you plan on someone not knowing they have access to something keeping them from accessing it.
This is fairly common on file servers, and internal applications such as CRM software.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably about the worst security plan you can ever use is security by obscurity.<span id="more-39"></span>In case you aren&#8217;t familiar with the term, security by obscurity is when you plan on someone not knowing they have access to something keeping them from accessing it.</p>
<p>This is fairly common on file servers, and internal applications such as CRM software.  All to often the domain groups Everyone or Authenticated Users will be used to grant access to network resources that only a subset of users need access to.  Often this is done because &#8220;eventually more people will need access to the network resource, so well just open it to everyone now&#8221;.  But even if others need access to the network resource later this isn&#8217;t a very good reason for granting everyone access to the resource.</p>
<p>The group that requested the resource may assume that the resource is not open to everyone (how would they know otherwise) and put data in that folder or application which others within the company shouldn&#8217;t have access to.  Now all of a sudden you&#8217;ve got a security breach just waiting to happen.  The employees that aren&#8217;t supose to have access find out that they have access to it, and start looking around and there&#8217;s all this data that they shouldn&#8217;t be able to see.  It could be company financials, it could be HR data, it could be the executives vacation photos, or the crown jewel of data your customers personally identifiable information.</p>
<p>Assume that it&#8217;s customer data, that hasn&#8217;t been masked for one reason or another, and a less than scrupulous employee comes across the data.  Being the less than scrupulous employee that they are they take the data and find a buyer for it, and not all of a sudden your customers all have identity theft issues.  All because someone didn&#8217;t set the rights to some network resource correctly.  Talk about something that should have been easy to avoid but is going to cause a lot of pain.</p>
<p>Considering that anywhere from <a href="http://redtape.msnbc.com/2007/10/study-id-thieve.html" target="_blank">34%</a> to <a href="http://www.continuitycentral.com/news04572.html" target="_blank">70%</a> of data theft is by employees (depending on what report you read)<a href="http://consumerist.com/313952/36-of-identity-thieves-are-women" target="_blank"> </a>security by obscurity just seams like it isn&#8217;t the way to go.</p>
<p>Denny</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securityfightclub.com/security-by-obscurity-is-not-security-at-all/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If the user doesn&#8217;t know the password a few times, lock&#8217;em out</title>
		<link>http://www.securityfightclub.com/if-the-user-doesnt-know-the-password-a-few-times-lockem-out/</link>
		<comments>http://www.securityfightclub.com/if-the-user-doesnt-know-the-password-a-few-times-lockem-out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 18:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mrdenny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brute Force Cracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[External Threats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internal Threats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Passwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL Server]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securityfightclub.com/?p=121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the easiest things that you can do to keep people from guessing passwords is to slow them down.  Obviously I don&#8217;t mean do tell the person to try to log in less frequently, that just wouldn&#8217;t make any sense.  When someone is knocking on your computer&#8217;s door and trying a brute force password [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the easiest things that you can do to keep people from guessing passwords is to slow them down.  Obviously I don&#8217;t mean do tell the person to try to log in less frequently, that just wouldn&#8217;t make any sense.  When someone is knocking on your computer&#8217;s door and trying a brute force password attack, make them slow down.<span id="more-121"></span>Every system, either Internet facing or not (but especially Internet facing) should be configured so that if the wrong password is used to many times the account is automatically locked out for some period of time (more than a few minutes, less than a day) unless you have a secure way for users to verify who they are and reset there password.  If you have this sort of secure method to verify someone and reset there password, preferably in some sort of automated fashion you should do this and lock the account out until an administrator unlocks it (or customer service/help desk if this is your line of business app) or until the user resets the password.</p>
<p>In a perfect world this should be done at all layers of your application, both at the front end and at the back end.  At the front end, this is usually easy, as you control the application, and the code that goes into it.  Adding a module like this is pretty easy.  On the back end you&#8217;ve got less options available to you.  You are pretty much at the mercy of your database vendor on this one.</p>
<p>However the database vendors have heard our requests for more security in the platforms and they have begun to respond.  As an example <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/sql/" target="_blank">Microsoft SQL Server</a> has since the release of SQL Server 2005 included the ability to have the SQL Logons follow the same security requirements as Windows Logons on the Windows Active Directory domain.  (Other database vendors may offer similar features, but as I mostly use Microsoft SQL Server I&#8217;m not aware of them.  If you are please feel free to comment below.)</p>
<p>Now with this comes some risk.  Because if you were to enable these settings and someone did try to break into the database server using this account, the account would lock out.  This is both good and bad.  Its good because they aren&#8217;t able to continue the attack, however its also bad because your business application isn&#8217;t able to log into the database either.</p>
<p>Open source apps such as WordPress are starting to get these features added into them.  There&#8217;s a plugin for WordPress called &#8220;<a href="http://www.bad-neighborhood.com/" target="_blank">Login LockDown</a>&#8221; which allows the WordPress admin site to lock it self down if the same person gets the password wrong more than <em>n</em> number of times.  The options are totally configurable by the blog owner, so you can set your settings as high or as low as you want.</p>
<p>So, what&#8217;s the point of all this you ask?  It&#8217;s pretty simple, and it is easier when you look at the math.  Assume you wanted to attack a system which takes 1/10th of a second to check a password.  Using the characters on the standard keyboard (letters, numbers, symbols) you&#8217;ve got ~94 characters to work with.  Assuming an 4 character password of say &#8220;test&#8221; there are 78074896 character combination to try.  Assuming you try all the combination (just to make sure you get the correct password) it will take about 90 days to test all the options.  Now if every 5 failed attempts we lock the account for one hour that test times goes from 90 days to 3012 years (if I&#8217;m done my math correctly).</p>
<p>The next question then becomes, why would anyone take 90 days to break my password.  The answer is that they wouldn&#8217;t.  They would use more than one machine to reduce that 90 days down to a more manageable number.  If using 10 computers and you break with workload up evenly across the 10 computers that 90 days, is now 9 days.  20 computers will get it done in 4.5 days.  50 computers will get it done in 1.8 days.  All of a sudden by simply throwing a few computers at the problem the password gets broken very quickly.  Now longer passwords will make this take longer, but if you have a system which people really want to break into they could get access to one of the large <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Botnet" target="_blank">botnets</a> and have 100,000 computers work on breaking into your site.  Even with a very strong password, it wouldn&#8217;t take all that long to brute force your way into your passwords.</p>
<p>The only sure fire way to stop someone from brute forcing there way into your accounts is to lock those accounts after the password has been tried incorrectly several times.  Don&#8217;t make the limits to low that your customers can get into there own services, but don&#8217;t make them so loose that people can break into those services.</p>
<p>Denny</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securityfightclub.com/if-the-user-doesnt-know-the-password-a-few-times-lockem-out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Looks like phishers are now using the phone again</title>
		<link>http://www.securityfightclub.com/looks-like-phishers-are-now-using-the-phone-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.securityfightclub.com/looks-like-phishers-are-now-using-the-phone-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 02:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mrdenny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data Loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[External Threats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Passwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Engenering]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securityfightclub.com/looks-like-phishers-are-now-using-the-phone-again/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It appears that the phishers are going back to some good old social engenering to get your info.
I just received this text message &#8220;First Heritage Bank Alert: Your CARD has been DEACTIVATED. Please contact us at 877-649-1737 to REACTIVATE.&#8221;.  Now I know this is a scam for a couple of reasons.
1. I don&#8217;t have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It appears that the phishers are going back to some good old social engenering to get your info.</p>
<p>I just received this text message &#8220;First Heritage Bank Alert: Your CARD has been DEACTIVATED. Please contact us at 877-649-1737 to REACTIVATE.&#8221;.  Now I know this is a scam for a couple of reasons.</p>
<p>1. I don&#8217;t have an account with First Heritage Bank<br />
2. A bank wouldn&#8217;t text me to have them call me.<br />
3.  They&#8217;d tell me to call without providing a number, instead telling me to use the number on my card.<br />
4. They&#8217;d identify the account which has a problem.</p>
<p>If you see this don&#8217;t call them.  I&#8217;d say report it to your local law enforcement but they probably don&#8217;t really care, and probably won&#8217;t do anything about it.  Good luck if you decide to call your local law enforcement.</p>
<p>Denny</p>
<p>P.s. Sorry for any spelling issues.  This was posted from my blackberry.  I&#8217;ll spell check from home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securityfightclub.com/looks-like-phishers-are-now-using-the-phone-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Keep those workstations locked</title>
		<link>http://www.securityfightclub.com/keep-those-workstations-locked/</link>
		<comments>http://www.securityfightclub.com/keep-those-workstations-locked/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 18:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mrdenny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data Loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[External Threats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internal Threats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Browser Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain Policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Passwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securityfightclub.com/?p=113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everyone in IT knows who you don&#8217;t leave your workstation unlocked when you leave your desk.  It&#8217;s because your co-workers will send fart jokes to the boss from your machine as punishment.  However there are actual security reasons for not leaving your machine unlocked.
When you leave your workstation unlocked you are giving anyone that walks [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone in IT knows who you don&#8217;t leave your workstation unlocked when you leave your desk.  It&#8217;s because your co-workers will send fart jokes to the boss from your machine as punishment.  However there are actual security reasons for not leaving your machine unlocked.<span id="more-113"></span></p>
<p>When you leave your workstation unlocked you are giving anyone that walks by access to everything on your computer.  Your email, access to the company intranet, etc.  Anything that you have access to without entering a username and password (or that has a saved username and password) they have access to.</p>
<p>Have iTunes installed on your work computer with a credit card saved in it so you can grab the new song that just came out?  So do they.  They could download 10,000 songs on your account and you wouldn&#8217;t know it until the next time you opened iTunes or checked your credit card statement.  (I&#8217;m assuming that iTunes will save your credit card, I don&#8217;t actually use it but you get the idea.)</p>
<p>Have usernames and passwords saved in your browser so you can easily log into various websites like your bank, credit cards, forums, etc?  So does anyone who sits at your computer.</p>
<p>You are probably sitting there thinking to your self, if some strange person was sitting at my desk, someone would notice.  They might, but probably not.  Lots of times I&#8217;ve had strange people sitting in my chair waiting for me with no one around to question them.</p>
<p>If you have an office, you aren&#8217;t exempt.  Yes I know that you lock your office door at night.  Look around your office, do you have a trash can sitting in there somewhere?  Do you use it?  Is it empty in the morning?  The magic trash can fairy doesn&#8217;t clean out your trash.  Someone who makes way to little money to clean up after the slobs in the office (sorry I&#8217;m projecting a little here, or depending on your office maybe I&#8217;m not) comes in and cleans it out and dusts your desk off.  You know how they get in, either they have a key or the guards open the doors for them.</p>
<p>I know that one company I worked at everyone who had an office would be gone by 7pm.  At about 9pm the security guards would come around and unlock every single office from the lowest manager to the highest C level exec.  I know this because I worked swing there as a Database Engineer for several years (pretty much every department except for Marketing was staffed 24&#215;7 365 days a year).  After the guards would open the offices the cleaning crew would come through and clean all the offices, empty the trash, etc.  Some offices had a window to the inside of the building, some didn&#8217;t.  Most had blinds that could be closed for privacy.  Lost of people had only a laptop, many were left at the office on weeknights, and many people had a desktop.  I would say that 80% of offices had a computer in them at night.</p>
<p>How hard would it be for an outside person to pay someone from the cleaning crew $5000 to get them to copy some data to a USB drive, or infect the network with a virus?  That&#8217;s probably more than most people on the cleaning crew make in a month for just a few minutes of work.  To most people, especially in this economy this would probably be to much money to pass up.</p>
<p>If a competitor (or an employee for that matter) wanted access to data that was private, and we didn&#8217;t have a policy in place to automatically lock the computers, it would have been a piece of cake for someone to sit at a desk and download all sorts of confidential data from the persons computer.  All without anyone knowing about it.</p>
<p>Fortunately at this company we had a policy which required the computers to lock them selves, but many smaller companies don&#8217;t enable this feature for one reason or another.</p>
<p>If your computer isn&#8217;t locked when you get to work in the morning I urge you to talk to your IT staff and have them enable auto-locking on the company computers.  It&#8217;s a slight annoyance to have to unlock your computer in the morning, but it&#8217;s much better than having someone walk in and simply take all your personal and corporate data.</p>
<p>Denny</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securityfightclub.com/keep-those-workstations-locked/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Keep your databases off the Internet</title>
		<link>http://www.securityfightclub.com/keep-your-databases-off-the-internet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.securityfightclub.com/keep-your-databases-off-the-internet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 02:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mrdenny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Attack Scripts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brute Force Cracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Endpoints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firewalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Listeners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Routers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Service Broker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACLs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Endpoint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firewall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Listener]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VPN]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securityfightclub.com/?p=99</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are way to many people who keep there database servers available from the public Internet.  This is just a disaster waiting to happen.
Your database holds all of your data.  If someone was to great into your database server they would have access to view, and possibly delete all your data forcing you to restore [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are way to many people who keep there database servers available from the public Internet.  This is just a disaster waiting to happen.<span id="more-99"></span></p>
<p>Your database holds all of your data.  If someone was to great into your database server they would have access to view, and possibly delete all your data forcing you to restore your data from your backup.  In a perfect world there would be no database servers directly accessible from the Internet.  There is pretty much no reason for database servers to be directly accessible from the Internet.</p>
<p>If your servers are CoLo&#8217;d then setup a VPN between your office and the CoLo, or VPN directly into the CoLo.  There are some hosting providers which prefer to setup the servers on public IPs, however most of them will if requested use private IPs and configure a Site to Site VPN connection for you.</p>
<p>Pretty much the only times that a database needs to be on the Internet would be if you are replicating data between servers as this will typically require that at least one of the servers be on the public Internet.  SQL Service Broker can need to be on the public Internet as well.  However in both of these cases, you don&#8217;t need to give the server a public IP.  You can give the server a private IP, and NAT the server from the Internet to the private IP.  However make sure that only the correct port or ports are open through the firewall.</p>
<p>In Oracle this should be done by setting up a new listener.  In SQL Server this is done by setting up a new endpoint either for general connection, or in the case of Service Broker an Endpoint is used to connect to, which listens on a seperate TCP port.  When setting up these listeners or endpoints make sure that only the accounts which need to have access to them have access.  This way the minimal attack surface is avaialble from the Internet.  In addition you will want to setup your firewall or router ACLs to allow only the required public IP addresses to have access to the listener or endpoint.</p>
<p>With your database being publicly available attack scripts could attack for it, or people could manually try and break in.  With SQL Server running in mixed mode, and with Oracle there are accounts which can be brute forced which have well known usernames such as system and sa.  When SQL Server is running in Windows only mode breaking in is harder, but not impossible.</p>
<p>Denny</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securityfightclub.com/keep-your-databases-off-the-internet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IIS Honeypots</title>
		<link>http://www.securityfightclub.com/iis-honeypots/</link>
		<comments>http://www.securityfightclub.com/iis-honeypots/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 20:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mrdenny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Attack Scripts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Servers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Servers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Honeypot]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securityfightclub.com/?p=100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IIS Honeypots are a great way to keep people from doing damage to your IIS boxes.  There&#8217;s a variety of techniques that you can use to create a honey pot on your web servers.One technique which I like is to configure an additional Website within IIS to handle website requests which are sent to incorrect [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IIS Honeypots are a great way to keep people from doing damage to your IIS boxes.  There&#8217;s a variety of techniques that you can use to create a honey pot on your web servers.<span id="more-100"></span>One technique which I like is to configure an additional Website within IIS to handle website requests which are sent to incorrect host headers.  This does require that you setup all your sites to use host headers.  Then setup a website to listen on all IPs on the server but with no host headers.  This way it will answer all requests which are made to IP addresses only.  Then configure this site in IIS to require authentication and not allow anynomous authentication.  This will present the scripts that the script kiddies with a username and password.  Most of there scripts don&#8217;t know how to handle a username and password prompt.  Then remove the rights from the folder so that what ever accont the script tries will fail.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t forget to log the requests and check them regularly so that you can block access to those IPs if needed.</p>
<p>This technique works well in other web servers as well, I&#8217;m just most farmilier with IIS.</p>
<p>Denny</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securityfightclub.com/iis-honeypots/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What’s the difference between encrypted data and hashed data?</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/sql-server/whats-the-difference-between-encrypted-data-and-hashed-data/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/sql-server/whats-the-difference-between-encrypted-data-and-hashed-data/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 23:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>SQL Server with Mr. Denny &#62; Security » Security</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data Loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Databases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hashing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicated]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Database]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Database security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL Server with mrDenny]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com://cd3f182395a3b899fc859e702e189ed0</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The biggest difference between encrypted data and hashed data is that encrypted data can be decrypted later.  Hash algorithms such as MD5 are one way hashing algorithms which means that the value that is returned can't be decrypted back to the original value.

It is important to know the difference between ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[The biggest difference between encrypted data and hashed data is that encrypted data can be decrypted later.  Hash algorithms such as MD5 are one way hashing algorithms which means that the value that is returned can't be decrypted back to the original value.

It is important to know the difference between ...]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securityfightclub.com/what%e2%80%99s-the-difference-between-encrypted-data-and-hashed-data/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

